Towards Decision Support in Reciprocation
نویسندگان
چکیده
People often interact repeatedly: with relatives, through file sharing, in politics, etc. Many such interactions are reciprocal: reacting to the actions of the other. In order to facilitate decisions regarding reciprocal interactions, we analyze the development of reciprocation over time. To this end, we propose a model for such interactions that is simple enough to enable formal analysis, but is sufficient to predict how such interactions will evolve. Inspired by existing models of international interactions and arguments between spouses, we suggest a model with two reciprocating attitudes where an agent’s action is a weighted combination of the others’ last actions (reacting) and either i) her innate kindness, or ii) her own last action (inertia). We analyze a network of repeatedly interacting agents, each having one of these attitudes, and prove that their actions converge to specific limits. Convergence means that the interaction stabilizes, and the limits indicate the behavior after the stabilization. For two agents, we describe the interaction process and find the limit values. For a general connected network, we find these limit values if all the agents employ the second attitude, and show that the agents’ actions then all become equal. In the other cases, we study the limit values using simulations. We discuss how these results predict interaction’s evolution and can be used to support agents in their behavior.
منابع مشابه
Towards Reasoning About Strategic Moves and Reciprocity With i* and Game Trees
Reciprocity is an important motivator of human judgement and is frequently used to justify decisions. It is a common feature of social relationships wherein beneficial conduct is encouraged through rewards while deleterious behaviors are discouraged via punishment. However, despite its ubiquity and pervasiveness in intraand inter-organizational relationships, there are circumstances when recipr...
متن کاملCooperation in Decentralised Networks
This paper describes a new model of cooperation between autonomous participants in decentralised networks. Our approach is based on reciprocation between immediate neighbours, which does not require any centralised infrastructure for accounting or identity management. We describe the conditions that are necessary for reciprocation to occur, and show how reciprocation between immediate neighbour...
متن کاملReciprocity of agonistic support in ravens
Cooperative behaviour through reciprocation or interchange of valuable services in primates has received considerable attention, especially regarding the timeframe of reciprocation and its ensuing cognitive implications. Much less, however, is known about reciprocity in other animals, particularly birds. We investigated patterns of agonistic support (defined as a third party intervening in an o...
متن کاملMoving Towards Accountability for Reasonableness – A Systematic Exploration of the Features of Legitimate Healthcare Coverage Decision-Making Processes Using Rare Diseases and Regenerative Therapies as a Case Study
Background The accountability for reasonableness (A4R) framework defines 4 conditions for legitimate healthcare coverage decision processes: Relevance, Publicity, Appeals, and Enforcement. The aim of this study was to reflect on how the diverse features of decision-making processes can be aligned with A4R conditions to guide decisio...
متن کاملExploding Offers Can Blow Up in More Than One Way
We study a game in which the proposer can issue an extended or exploding offer. The responder is waiting for a better alternative, and an exploding offer has to be accepted or rejected before the responder knows whether a better alternative will arrive. An extended offer allows the responder to wait and first learn about the outcome of a better alternative. The responder, after accepting the pr...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- CoRR
دوره abs/1601.07965 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016